LW500F / LW500LK transmission-repair claim rejected: А27-24961/2016
Read record, response & limits
Repair dispute; defect attribution and warranty timing unproved
A rebuilt YJSV315 transmission labelled LW500F was reportedly fitted to LW500LK. The expert discussed debris and defects that could reflect poor repair, but component identity, objective cause and failure within warranty were not sufficiently proved. Dismissal was upheld.
Outcome and response
Appeal dismissed; later cassation status not verified.
Court text independently read on an unofficial mirror; the official registry and any unreviewed later decisions were not independently checked. This concerns the identified dispute, not model-wide prevalence or a recall. The dispute is about third-party repair, with inconsistent machine/component identity. The expert’s use of production-defect terminology must not be converted into a proved XCMG factory defect.
Full judgment text read on public Sudact mirror.
А27-24961/2016; transmission identification, expert limitations, warranty proof and operative disposition.