THE MODEL EVIDENCE FILE

LW500LK

1 evidence record explicitly names this label.

In plain language: Use these records to prepare questions about a machine. A catalogue listing is not proof of stock or local approval. Price and finance records are dated references, not current offers.

This is the exact label stated in the evidence. No exact match was found in the supplied October 2026 model catalogue. A missing match does not establish that the model never existed or is unavailable. Specifications and related variants are not inferred. Evidence-record counts are not unique-document or independent-source counts.

Russia · Court records

LW500F / LW500LK transmission-repair claim rejected: А27-24961/2016

Read record, response & limits

Court decision · Seventh Arbitration Appeal Court, via Sudact · Full-text judgment date: 2017-10-03

Repair dispute; defect attribution and warranty timing unproved

A rebuilt YJSV315 transmission labelled LW500F was reportedly fitted to LW500LK. The expert discussed debris and defects that could reflect poor repair, but component identity, objective cause and failure within warranty were not sufficiently proved. Dismissal was upheld.

Outcome and response
Appeal dismissed; later cassation status not verified.

Reading limits

Court text independently read on an unofficial mirror; the official registry and any unreviewed later decisions were not independently checked. This concerns the identified dispute, not model-wide prevalence or a recall. The dispute is about third-party repair, with inconsistent machine/component identity. The expert’s use of production-defect terminology must not be converted into a proved XCMG factory defect.

Full judgment text read on public Sudact mirror.

А27-24961/2016; transmission identification, expert limitations, warranty proof and operative disposition.

All reviewed model evidence · Manufacturer catalogue