THE MODEL EVIDENCE FILE

QY25K4

1 evidence record explicitly names this label.

In plain language: Use these records to prepare questions about a machine. A catalogue listing is not proof of stock or local approval. Price and finance records are dated references, not current offers.

This is the exact label stated in the evidence. No exact match was found in the supplied October 2026 model catalogue. A missing match does not establish that the model never existed or is unavailable. Specifications and related variants are not inferred. Evidence-record counts are not unique-document or independent-source counts.

Netherlands · Court records

Putevi and Jedinstvo crane-sale judgment, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2013:5327

Read record, response & limits

Primary court judgment · Rechtbank Rotterdam; official Rechtspraak XML service · Judgment date (published July16): 2013-07-03

Buyers’ nonconformity/rescission claims rejected

In a sale of six 2007 XCMG cranes, five identified as QY25K4, the court rejected buyers’ rescission/refund claims concerning new/unused status and CE certification. It interpreted the agreed terms and the buyers’ knowledge; reasonable expert costs were awarded to the seller.

Outcome and response
Buyers’ main claims dismissed; some seller counterclaims allowed. XCMG was the brand, not a litigant.

Reading limits

No CE certification was established. Quality/corrosion statements in paragraph 4.7 were treated as undisputed between those parties; they are not an independent model-wide defect study. The safety discussion in 4.11 is case-specific. No later appeal status checked.

Original official XML retrieved through the court content endpoint. Model/facts paragraph 2.1, assessment 4.6–4.19 and operative 5.1–5.8 read; litigation context and source metadata checked.

ECLI:NL:RBROT:2013:5327; paragraphs2.1,4.6–4.19,5.1–5.8

Read source documentSource register · S089
Related source representation: Putevi and Jedinstvo crane-sale judgment, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2013:5327 · S090

Additional representation or related link supplied in this review. The model evidence conclusion relies on the primary source and its stated review scope; no separate full-body review is claimed for this link.

All reviewed model evidence · Manufacturer catalogue