THE MODEL EVIDENCE FILE

XC6-3007K

1 evidence record explicitly names this label.

In plain language: Use these records to prepare questions about a machine. A catalogue listing is not proof of stock or local approval. Price and finance records are dated references, not current offers.

This is the exact label stated in the evidence. No exact match was found in the supplied October 2026 model catalogue. A missing match does not establish that the model never existed or is unavailable. Specifications and related variants are not inferred. Evidence-record counts are not unique-document or independent-source counts.

Russia · Court records

XC6-3007V / XC6-3007K: unremedied unit faults and narrowed damages

Read record, response & limits

Court decision · Moscow Region Arbitration Court, via Sudact · Full-text judgment date: 2025-08-11

Court-accepted product faults; damages narrowed on appeal

The court recorded front-axle oil transfer, brake locking and overheating in one telehandler, serial XUG3007VKPED00376. The sale price had been refunded. The initial additional damages award was reduced on appeal to ₽72,433 maintenance expenses; rental-loss recovery was rejected.

Outcome and response
Appeal reduction 21 October 2025 upheld in cassation 25 February 2026; Supreme Court transfer refused 3 June 2026.

Reading limits

Unofficial mirrors. The narrative labels the unit XC6-3007V, while its specification says XC6-3007K; do not count two machines. No independent factory root-cause finding. Later records are public excerpts/annotations, not complete merits texts.

Full judgment text read on public Sudact mirror.

А41-116819/2024; warranty repair history and disposition; later cassation excerpt expressly confirms reduced maintenance-only recovery.

Read source documentSource register · S068
Telehandler damages appeal, 10АП-14222/2025 · S069

Public judgment excerpt and publisher outcome annotation read; full subscribed text unavailable. Reduction to maintenance expenses supported.

Telehandler damages cassation, Ф05-22641/2025 · S070

Public judgment excerpt and publisher outcome annotation read; full subscribed text unavailable. Appeal reduction upheld.

Supreme Court refusal to transfer, 305-ЭС26-5193 · S071

Full short order read in indexed public text; chronology links independently retrieved. Refusal to transfer is procedural, not a new technical examination.

All reviewed model evidence · Manufacturer catalogue