XCMG Files.
More research
Home / Browse topics / XCMG XC6-3514K — documented evidence and source limits
THE MODEL EVIDENCE FILE

XC6-3514K

1 evidence record explicitly names this label.

In plain language: Use these records to prepare questions about a machine. A catalogue listing is not proof of stock or local approval. Price and finance records are dated references, not current offers.

This is the exact label stated in the evidence. No exact match was found in the supplied October 2026 model catalogue. A missing match does not establish that the model never existed or is unavailable. Specifications and related variants are not inferred. Evidence-record counts are not unique-document or independent-source counts.

Russia · Court records

XC6-3514K replacement claim rejected: А56-70312/2024

Read record, response & limits

Court decision · St Petersburg and Leningrad Region Arbitration Court, via Sudact · Full-text judgment date: 2026-04-13

Manufacturing-defect allegation not proved

The buyer alleged forward travel after reverse selection. The ordered examination was not completed, and manufacturing origin was unproved. The court rejected replacement and related claimed insurance expenses.

Outcome and response
First-instance claim dismissed; later appeal status not verified.

Reading limits

Court text independently read on an unofficial mirror; the official registry and any unreviewed later decisions were not independently checked. This concerns the identified dispute, not model-wide prevalence or a recall. An unproved manufacturing claim is not a technical finding that no defect existed. Heading 12 April differs from full text 13 April; text also uses Cyrillic ХС6-3514К.

Full judgment text read on public Sudact mirror.

А56-70312/2024; alleged travel-direction malfunction, incomplete expert examination, and final dismissal.

Read source documentSource register · S082

All reviewed model evidence · Manufacturer catalogue