XCT25L5_SR engine damage: employee wage-deduction challenge
Read record, response & limits
Employment liability; continued operation after engine symptoms
The court rejected an employee’s challenge to discipline and wage deductions after crane-engine damage. It accepted the employer’s account of continued operation after smoke/knocking despite the employee’s competing service-related explanation.
Outcome and response
First-instance employee claim rejected; later appeal status not verified.
Court text independently read on an unofficial mirror; the official registry and any unreviewed later decisions were not independently checked. This concerns the identified dispute, not model-wide prevalence or a recall. Employment case, not product liability. Body gives 18 March, mirror heading 31 March; final-form date and incident dates are redacted. Employer investigation is not an independent factory examination.
Full judgment text read on public Sudact mirror.
Case 2-177/2026; engine symptom sequence, competing accounts, employer procedure and final refusal.