XCMG Files.
More research
Home / Browse topics / XCMG XG480D — documented evidence and source limits
THE MODEL EVIDENCE FILE

XG480D

1 evidence record explicitly names this label.

In plain language: Use these records to prepare questions about a machine. A catalogue listing is not proof of stock or local approval. Price and finance records are dated references, not current offers.

This is the exact label stated in the evidence. No exact match was found in the supplied October 2026 model catalogue. A missing match does not establish that the model never existed or is unavailable. Specifications and related variants are not inferred. Evidence-record counts are not unique-document or independent-source counts.

Russia · Court records

XG480D hoist-gearbox rental damage: А40-226237/2025

Read record, response & limits

Court decision · Moscow Arbitration Court, via Sudact · Full-text judgment date: 2026-03-13

Rental damage liability; use attributed in contractual reasoning

An XG480D diaphragm-wall grab’s hoist gearbox failed during rental. The court awarded repair-related loss against the lessee, relying on signed condition/diagnosis records and rental obligations. Its reasoning attributed damage to improper use, rather than establishing a manufacturing cause.

Outcome and response
First-instance recovery granted; later appeal status not verified.

Reading limits

Court text independently read on an unofficial mirror; the official registry and any unreviewed later decisions were not independently checked. This concerns the identified dispute, not model-wide prevalence or a recall. This rental-liability judgment contains no independently conducted factory root-cause examination. Heading 12 March differs from full text 13 March.

Full judgment text read on public Sudact mirror.

А40-226237/25-13-1476; signed July 2024 diagnosis records, contractual allocation and disposition.

Read source documentSource register · S106

All reviewed model evidence · Manufacturer catalogue