XCMG Files.
More research
Home / Browse topics / XCMG XGC300-1 — documented evidence and source limits
THE MODEL EVIDENCE FILE

XGC300-1

1 evidence record explicitly names this label.

In plain language: Use these records to prepare questions about a machine. A catalogue listing is not proof of stock or local approval. Price and finance records are dated references, not current offers.

This is the exact label stated in the evidence. No exact match was found in the supplied October 2026 model catalogue. A missing match does not establish that the model never existed or is unavailable. Specifications and related variants are not inferred. Evidence-record counts are not unique-document or independent-source counts.

Russia · Court records

XGC300-1 operating-safety findings upheld: А40-97369/2024

Read record, response & limits

Judgment reproducing official safety findings · Moscow District Arbitration Court, via Sudact · Full-text judgment date: 2025-06-20

Operating-organisation safety violations; no factory finding

Cassation upheld Rostekhnadzor-related findings against the operating organisation concerning XGC300-1 unit XUG0032HMFC00048. The text describes lifting-plan/supervision shortcomings and operation without required commissioning and technical examination.

Outcome and response
Operator’s cassation dismissed; later proceedings not verified.

Reading limits

Court text independently read on an unofficial mirror; the official registry and any unreviewed later decisions were not independently checked. This concerns the identified dispute, not model-wide prevalence or a recall. Findings attach to industrial-safety operation and supervision. Avoid deriving an engineering overload percentage from ambiguous wording. Heading 19 June differs from full text 20 June.

Full judgment text read on public Sudact mirror.

А40-97369/2024; reproduced agency findings, operating-organisation responsibility, and disposition.

Read source documentSource register · S105

All reviewed model evidence · Manufacturer catalogue