XCMG Files.
More research
Home / Browse topics / XCMG XS265 — documented evidence and source limits
THE MODEL EVIDENCE FILE

XS265

1 evidence record explicitly names this label.

In plain language: Use these records to prepare questions about a machine. A catalogue listing is not proof of stock or local approval. Price and finance records are dated references, not current offers.

This is the exact label stated in the evidence. No exact match was found in the supplied October 2026 model catalogue. A missing match does not establish that the model never existed or is unavailable. Specifications and related variants are not inferred. Evidence-record counts are not unique-document or independent-source counts.

Russia · Court records

XS265 delivery deficiencies remedied: А40-214709/2023

Read record, response & limits

Court decision · Moscow District Arbitration Court, via Sudact · Full-text judgment date: 2025-03-10

Delivery completeness dispute; deficiencies remedied

The purchaser objected to an XS265 roller lacking an instrument panel, rear-view mirror and spare-item kit. The court upheld findings that deficiencies were remedied within contractual time and rejected the parties’ loss claims.

Outcome and response
Cassation dismissed; later status not verified.

Reading limits

Court text independently read on an unofficial mirror; the official registry and any unreviewed later decisions were not independently checked. This concerns the identified dispute, not model-wide prevalence or a recall. This concerns delivery completeness and acceptance, not mechanical failure. The mirror’s body inconsistently uses /2023 and /2024 case years; the heading is 9 March, full text 10 March.

Full judgment text read on public Sudact mirror.

А40-214709/2023 in heading; acceptance history, remedied deficiencies, and disposition.

Read source documentSource register · S085

All reviewed model evidence · Manufacturer catalogue