LATEST CHECKED POSITION

Where the record stands

The 5 December 2025 judgment upholds four transaction commissions, KSh270,000 unpaid salary for May–September 2020 and KSh60,000 notice pay, and dismisses the appeal with costs. Payment and any later appeal remain unverified. Sources: [1]

Response & qualifying evidence

The judgment records the employer’s challenges to the sales evidence, commission entitlement, unpaid-leave award and notice pay. The court found no proof of the employee’s consent to unpaid leave or that notice pay had been paid. Sources: [1]

What remains unestablished

Payment, a later appeal, responsibility of the listed parent or a group-wide employment practice. The commission figures contain internal inconsistencies, so no aggregate is silently corrected here.

CLOSE READING / 03 / A judgment’s boundaries

What did the Kenya appeal decide, and what remained open?

Distinguish upheld award components from payment, later appeals and parent-company responsibility.

5 December 2025 / Appellate judgment

Appeal dismissed. Awards upheld.

The employer’s challenges and the court’s reasoning are recorded separately in the response and qualifying evidence.

S010 · paras.40–57, PDF pp.6–8
Transaction commissions
Four componentsInternal figure inconsistencies; no silently corrected aggregate.
Unpaid salary
KSh270,000May–September 2020
Notice pay
KSh60,000Upheld award component
Upheld does not mean paid

Payment and any later appeal remain unverified. The judgment names Xcmg EA Limited; its ownership connection to the listed issuer is a separate registry check.

Read the entity-attribution boundary
Award components, not a total or a payment ledger. S010 · the reviewed judgment is the source for all three components. No group-wide employment practice is established.

The chronology

  1. The appeal is dismissed with costs; trial awards upheld.

    S010 paras.40–57 Sources: [1]

The next verification

Obtain later appeal/enforcement records, payment evidence and ownership proof.

Entity attribution

The judgment names Xcmg EA Limited as appellant. Its exact ownership connection to the listed issuer remains a separate registry check. Sources: [1]

THE SOURCE FILE

Sources for this article

1 linked sources. Cited records, reporting, responses and background are labelled below. A source establishes only what its review scope supports; separate proceedings and repeated coverage are not additional findings.

  1. SOURCE 1 / Court judgment / S010

    Xcmg EA Limited v Ofula (Appeal E267 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 3510 (KLR)

    Kenya Law; Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi · 2025-12-05 · Original language: English

    Published by Kenya Law; Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi.

    Used for / context: Full judgment; determination paras.40–57, PDF pp.6–8

    Review limits: Verified original judgment, all 57 paragraphs reviewed. Paragraphs 40–57, PDF pages 6–8; monetary typography inspected on page 6. No later appeal or payment proof reviewed. Judgment contains inconsistent aggregate commission and typographical figures; do not publish a silently corrected aggregate.

    Open source · Source register

    Return to: Chronology 2025-12-05 · Article summary · Current position · Response · Entity attribution

Media credits & reuse approach

Public source and outcome searches; no complete live docket certified.
Private editorial draft. Legal, translation, rights and publisher review pending.
File details, sources & related guides