Quebec dealer LTR and its parent bring an Alberta claim alleging defective equipment, missing documentation and parts/support, broken financing and return promises, and discrepancies between encoded manufacturing years and…
Keep in mind
User-supplied copy received 6 October 2026; not independently authenticated against the court registry. Pleadings record allegations and requested relief; no merits ruling or damages award is supplied.
Read the document, full limits and context
In plain language: Read the claim, the response and the outcome together. A claim is what someone says happened; it is not automatically a court finding. Open the original record to check the details.
What do these terms mean?
Allegation or pleading
What a party claims. It has not necessarily been accepted by a court.
Defence or response
The other party’s position. Read it beside the claim.
Procedural step
Something that happened in the case, not necessarily a decision about who was right.
Judgment or order
A court decision. Its scope, date and any later appeal still matter.
Reading limits
User-supplied copy received 6 October 2026; not independently authenticated against the court registry. Pleadings record allegations and requested relief; no merits ruling or damages award is supplied. Paragraphs 1-6 describe LTR as a Quebec dealer, Trois-Rivieres Location as its parent/co-borrower, XCMG Canada as supplier/distributor, XCMG Financial as affiliated lender and XCMG North America as manufacturer. The pleaded agency/single-enterprise/ownership descriptions are allegations, not independently verified corporate conclusions. Xuzhou Construction Machinery Group Co. Ltd. is described as a parent but is not a named defendant in this caption. No independent registry verification, service evidence, defence or subsequent order reviewed for this case. Equipment defects, corporate relationships, local-government incidents and serial decoding are plaintiffs' allegations; exhibits/correspondence/testing are not supplied with this pleading. No merits outcome, criminal finding or awarded damages established.
An existing text layer is available. Extraction may omit or reorder content; compare with the original. No OCR performed.
Accessible extracted text
PDF page 1 of 31 shown below. Verify quotations against the original.
PDF page 1
text-layer available
93651809\28
Clerk's Stamp
Form 10
Rule 3.25
COURT FILE NO.
COURT COURT OF KING'S BENCH OF ALBERTA
JUDICIAL CENTRE EDMONTON
PLAINTIFF LTR EQUIPMENT INC., TROIS-RIVIERES LOCATION INC.
DEFENDANT(S) XCMG CANADA LTD., XCMG AMERICA FINANCIAL LLC, XCMG
NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, JOHN DOE CORPORATION I,
JOHN DOE CORPORATION II, AND JOHN DOE CORPORATION III,
JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II, AND JOHN DOE III
DOCUMENT STATEMENT OF CLAIM
ADDRESS FOR
SERVICE AND
CONTACT
INFORMATION
OF PARTY
FILING THIS
DOCUMENT
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
1600, 421 – 7th Avenue SW
Calgary, AB T2P 4K9
Telephone (403) 298-1000
Facsimile (403) 263-9193
File No. G10017830
Attention: Theresa Nolan/ Caitlin Milne/ Naomi Austin
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT(S)
You are being sued. You are a defendant.
Go to the end of this document to see what you can do and when you must do it.
Statement of facts relied on:
FILED
DIGITALLY2603 07923Apr 10, 2026
8:58 AM
Mechanical extraction of the PDF’s existing text layer. No OCR performed. Reading order, stamps, handwriting, tables and symbols may be incomplete or inaccurate. Compare quotations with the unchanged original PDF; PDF page numbers refer to file pages, not necessarily printed page labels. Extraction is not court authentication or legal verification.
A copied link opens this record at the selected PDF file page in the extracted-text reader. After loading the original, “Open PDF” requests #page=N; native viewer support varies. You may need to enter the page manually.
First PDF page rendered from this unchanged supplied file. This image is a reading aid, not court authentication. It always shows page 1; the extracted-text page controls do not change this image.
FIRST PAGE · D002 · PDF page 1 only · unchanged supplied copy
Read the original
Open the PDF in your browser or download the unchanged supplied file.
Reporting: Amy Judd and Paul Johnson / Global News.
Global News quotes Ryan Martin, speaking at Vancouver’s law courts on October 16, alleging changed serial plates and model years on XCMG machines. XCMG Canada told Global News that Artic Machinery bought about $18 million in XCMG inventory it did not pay for, and that it is fully defending the civil claims. RCMP K Division confirmed its auto theft unit carried out the April search and that the investigation is ongoing.
Full publisher article read on 18 October 2026. Allegations are the dealer’s account, not court findings; the $18 million figure is XCMG Canada’s statement, not a judgment. The article spells the company "Arctic Machinery"; court records use "Artic Machinery". Whether Martin spoke in a hearing or to reporters is not stated.
We link to the source and provide our own short summary. We do not host its article text, footage, photographs, thumbnails or logos, and we claim no permission to reproduce them.
