Where the record stands
The first-instance court awarded RMB10,511,710.71 plus overdue interest against Chuanjiao Industry and Trade, with two debtor affiliates jointly liable. Jiangsu’s higher court affirmed on 19 October 2011; the guiding-case page was published in February 2013. Sources: [1] ¶
Response & qualifying evidence
The debtor companies disputed commingling and joint liability. XCMG sought affirmance. Its claims against the named individuals were rejected. Sources: [1] ¶
What remains unestablished
Wrongdoing by XCMG, collection of the award, or a rule automatically determining any separate dealer dispute. ¶
The next verification
Check any relevant enforcement history and obtain qualified translation.
Entity attribution
XCMG Construction Machinery was plaintiff/creditor. The commingling findings concern Chuanjiao Industry and Trade, Chuanjiao Machinery and Ruilu. Sources: [1] ¶
Sources for this article
1 linked sources. Cited records, reporting, responses and background are labelled below. A source establishes only what its review scope supports; separate proceedings and repeated coverage are not additional findings.
- SOURCE 1 / Official guiding-case publication of final judgments / S049
Guiding Case 15: XCMG Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. v Chengdu Chuanjiao Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Published by Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China.
Used for / context: 裁判结果; 基本案情; 裁判理由
Review limits: Verified original official court page. 裁判结果; 基本案情; 裁判理由. The commingling finding concerns debtor companies, not wrongdoing by XCMG. No collection/payment outcome reviewed.
Private editorial draft. Legal, translation, rights and publisher review pending.