PDF page 1
No extractable text is available for this page. Read the unchanged original; OCR has not been performed.
This order extends, varies and replaces the March 11 Mareva order and the March 25 relief.
User-supplied copy received 15 October 2026; not independently authenticated against the court registry. Five scanned pages read visually and by OCR; handwritten words checked against the page images.
In plain language: Read the claim, the response and the outcome together. A claim is what someone says happened; it is not automatically a court finding. Open the original record to check the details.
User-supplied copy received 15 October 2026; not independently authenticated against the court registry. Five scanned pages read visually and by OCR; handwritten words checked against the page images. Paragraph 4 refers to “the order of March 11, 2025”, an apparent typographical error for March 11, 2026. The order is expressed to remain in force to the November 23–27, 2026 return date unless varied or discharged; any later variation, discharge or appeal has not been reviewed. Security is not damages and the order does not decide the pleaded misconduct.
No usable existing text layer. OCR is needed before this copy can be searched reliably. No OCR performed.
PDF page 1 of 5 shown below. Verify quotations against the original.
No extractable text is available for this page. Read the unchanged original; OCR has not been performed.
Mechanical extraction of the PDF’s existing text layer. No OCR performed. Reading order, stamps, handwriting, tables and symbols may be incomplete or inaccurate. Compare quotations with the unchanged original PDF; PDF page numbers refer to file pages, not necessarily printed page labels. Extraction is not court authentication or legal verification.
Open the PDF in your browser or download the unchanged supplied file.
External coverage provides context. Repeated allegations do not become independent findings.
Sing Tao Daily Canada staff report.
Chinese-language report on Justice Crerar’s replacement asset-freeze order in the Wild Timber case: a 1.5 million monthly Canadian spending cap, 10 million security, sale-price limits and twice-monthly inventory and financial reports. It also reports XCMG Canada’s denial of serial-plate tampering and Ant Rental’s position on exclusivity.
Read at sourceFull article read on 18 October 2026. Based on Vancouver Sun reporting (R005), not independent court review. Some currency units are not stated. The order is interim relief, not a finding of fraud.
We link to the source and provide our own short summary. We do not host its article text, footage, photographs, thumbnails or logos, and we claim no permission to reproduce them.
bcbay. Individual creator credit not shown.
Chinese-language coverage of the September 4 replacement asset-freeze order in the Wild Timber case, giving the C$1.5 million monthly spending cap, C$10 million security and reporting terms, and stating that the court has not found fraud.
Read at sourceArticle text read on 18 October 2026. No byline or source credit shown; closely tracks the Sing Tao report (R050). Interim relief, not a merits judgment.
We link to the source and provide our own short summary. We do not host its article text, footage, photographs, thumbnails or logos, and we claim no permission to reproduce them.
Original URL: https://www.bcbay.com/news/2026/10/06/1038647.html
Unchanged user-supplied copy received 6 October 2026. This records file integrity, not independent authentication.
SHA-256: 4a78e68076663b2c735c7f705667973ac49947203e6ff2235cc03282513a6c37